Pandipedia is the world's first encyclopaedia of machine generated content approved by humans. You can contribute by simply searching and clicking/tapping on "Add To Pandipedia" in the answer you like. Learn More
Expand the world's knowledge as you search and help others. Go you!
Let's look at alternatives:
Coral reefs are vital ecosystems that significantly contribute to marine biodiversity and provide essential resources for countless species. Often termed as 'the rainforests of the sea,' they host an extraordinary variety of life, playing crucial roles in the health of oceanic environments.
Coral reefs are homes to an estimated 25% of all marine species, despite covering less than 1% of the ocean floor. They support over 4,000 species of fish and thousands of other marine organisms, including invertebrates and plant life[5][11]. The structural complexity provided by coral reefs creates numerous habitats essential for breeding, feeding, and sheltering, which benefits diverse aquatic populations[10][15]. This biodiversity contributes to a robust gene pool, enhancing the resilience of marine ecosystems against environmental changes and disasters[8][13].
The various species within coral reefs fulfill specific ecological roles that help maintain the overall health and balance of their ecosystems. For example, herbivorous fish play a critical role in managing algal growth, preventing harmful macroalgae from outcompeting corals for space and resources[15]. Additionally, many coral reef species engage in mutualistic relationships; for example, reef fish assist coral growth by consuming algae and pests, while corals provide food and habitat for the fish[2][4]. Such interactions are essential for the productivity and stability of coral ecosystems.
Coral reefs act as productive nurseries for many fish species, providing a safe and resource-rich environment for juveniles to grow and develop. This role is vital for maintaining fish populations, especially those crucial for local and global fisheries[4][7]. The reefs' intricate structures offer refuge from predators, enhancing survival rates among young marine organisms[10][14].
In addition to supporting marine biodiversity, coral reefs serve as natural barriers that protect coastal areas from wave energy and storm surges. They can reduce wave energy by up to 97%, thereby minimizing the impact of cyclones and hurricanes on adjacent land[6][12]. This protective function contributes to the stability of coastal ecosystems, which rely on healthy and intact coral reefs for their own vitality[9][11].
Coral reefs are not only ecologically significant but also economically important. They contribute to the livelihoods of over half a billion people worldwide, particularly through fisheries and tourism[3][4]. The annual commercial and recreational value of U.S. fisheries associated with coral reefs is estimated at $100 million, highlighting the economic stakes tied to these ecosystems[2]. Furthermore, coral reefs provide essential nutrition to coastal communities, supporting food security through sustainable fish populations[11][12].
The vast biodiversity found within coral reefs holds significant promise for medical discoveries. Many compounds derived from reef organisms are being researched for their potential to treat various diseases, including cancer and infections[1][8]. This aspect underscores the importance of preserving coral ecosystems not only for their ecological roles but also for their contributions to human health.
In summary, coral reefs play a critical role in sustaining marine life by providing habitat, supporting high biodiversity, acting as nurseries for juvenile fish, and serving as natural coastal protection. Their contributions extend beyond ecological functions, significantly impacting human communities through economic benefits and potential medicinal resources. The preservation of coral reefs is, therefore, essential for maintaining the health of marine ecosystems and the wellbeing of coastal populations that depend on them for sustenance and protection. The loss of these crucial ecosystems would not only threaten marine biodiversity but would also have far-reaching implications for global food security and economic stability.
Let's look at alternatives:
Get more accurate answers with Super Search, upload files, personalised discovery feed, save searches and contribute to the PandiPedia.
In recent developments in artificial intelligence, the introduction of Agent S represents a significant advancement. This novel framework enables machines to interact with computers as effectively as humans do, bridging the gap between human ingenuity and machine efficiency.
Agent S is designed to tackle complex, multi-step tasks commonly found in desktop environments. It utilizes a combination of advanced features like Experience-Augmented Hierarchical Planning and an Agent-Computer Interface to accomplish more dynamic and context-aware interactions. The framework aims to empower individuals, particularly those with disabilities, to perform computer tasks seamlessly through a more intuitive and accessible interface[1].
The architecture consists of several integral components:
Narrative Memory: Helps in documenting past experiences and guiding future actions.
Episode Memory: Tracks specific task completions to improve the agent's learning process.
Agent-Computer Interface (ACI): Facilitates intuitive interaction between the user and the system, enhancing accessibility and execution of commands[1].
Agent S utilizes a sophisticated planning module that allows it to break down complex tasks into manageable subtasks. This approach is crucial for successful navigation of task-oriented workflows, significantly improving the efficiency of task completion[1].
Moreover, the incorporation of self-supervised exploration allows Agent S to learn from its environment actively. As the agent interacts with various desktop applications, it retains valuable contextual information about actions and outcomes, which can be utilized for future tasks. This continuous learning process enhances its capability to handle diverse requests with greater accuracy and relevance[1].
The Agent-Computer Interface (ACI) of Agent S is specifically designed to augment user experience when interacting with graphical user interfaces (GUIs). It includes unique action types tailored for specific inputs, such as mouse clicks, typing instructions, and even executing commands through keyboard shortcuts[1]. This structured design minimizes the complexity of executing routine commands and improves user adaptability.
For example, the ACI employs a dual-input strategy, where the agent blends visual input with contextual information from previous interactions to make informed decisions about upcoming actions. This method is essential for maintaining the flow of task execution and ensuring that the agent grounds its actions based on real-time feedback from the environment[1].
Agent S's architecture integrates two types of memory: narrative memory and episodic memory. Narrative memory helps the agent retain experiences from various tasks, allowing it to develop a repository of knowledge that informs its future actions. Episodic memory, on the other hand, captures successful subtask experiences, enhancing the agent's ability to plan and execute tasks more effectively[1].
The agent's performance is evaluated through various benchmarks, revealing that it is capable of achieving impressive success rates in task completions. In comparison tests with established models, Agent S exhibits superior performance, validating its functional capabilities[1].
The potential applications of Agent S are vast, spanning numerous domains. From automating mundane office tasks to assisting users with disabilities, the framework holds promise for enhancing productivity and accessibility in computing environments. This is particularly beneficial in professional settings that require precision and efficiency, such as data entry or software development[1].
In specific case studies, Agent S has successfully navigated numerous desktop applications, showcasing its versatility in completing tasks like file management, data manipulation, and interaction with various software interfaces. By employing a combination of hierarchical planning and contextual memory retrieval, the agent can adapt to changing scenarios, ensuring optimal performance[1].
In summary, Agent S represents a noteworthy advancement in how machines interact with computers, effectively mimicking human-like operational capabilities. Through its innovative framework that combines experience-augmented planning and intuitive interfaces, Agent S stands to transform a wide range of tasks, making them more accessible and manageable for users across different domains. As AI continues to evolve, tools like Agent S pave the way for a future where interactions with technology become more fluid and user-friendly. The integration of such systems not only improves efficiency but also empowers individuals by enhancing their capability to perform complex tasks with ease[1].
Let's look at alternatives:
People use humor as a coping mechanism because it helps relieve the burden of stressful emotions and can shift perspectives on difficult situations. Humor enables individuals to look at circumstances differently, recognizing absurdities that may otherwise feel overwhelming. This process, known as reappraisal, allows for a lighter perspective on stressors, promoting resilience and emotional health[1][2][6].
Additionally, humor fosters social connections, enhancing feelings of support and decreasing psychological distress. However, the type of humor used is crucial; positive humor can improve mood and social support, while self-defeating humor may lead to increased stress and less social connection[2][6].
Let's look at alternatives:
Evaluating the generalisation capabilities of AI systems, especially within the context of human-AI teams, is critical to ensuring that machine outputs align well with human expectations. The source explains that generalisation evaluation involves examining how well an AI model extends its learnt patterns to new situations. This is particularly significant for human-AI teaming, where systems must reliably support human decision-making and problem solving without unexpected errors or misalignments[1].
The evaluation of AI generalisation is discussed using a variety of metrics and methods. One method involves measuring distributional shifts between training and test data. The source states that such shifts can be estimated using statistical distance measures, for example, the Kullback-Leibler divergence or the Wasserstein distance. Generative models provide an explicit likelihood estimate p(x) to indicate how typical a sample is of the training distribution. For discriminative models, proxy techniques include the calculation of cosine similarity between embedding vectors and nearest-neighbour distances using transformed feature spaces. In the case of large language models (LLMs), measuring perplexity is a common proxy to assess generalisation in terms of internal representations[1].
A major part of evaluating AI generalisation involves the concepts of undergeneralisation and overgeneralisation. The text notes that undergeneralisation occurs when a slight change in the input—whether perceptible or not—leads to a significant alteration in model output. This may occur when an AI model fails to account for small variations such as camera or environmental perturbations, leading to a notable degradation in performance. On the other hand, overgeneralisation is described as the model making overconfident errors in its predictions, such as generating hallucinations or biased predictions where the model ignores critical differences in input features. The evaluation framework must therefore include tests for both types of errors, examining tasks with adversarial, counterfactual, or naturally shifted examples to assess robustness[1].
A challenge in the evaluation process is to distinguish between memorisation and genuine generalisation. Memorisation refers to the model learning specific details from the training data, which may sometimes be beneficial (for instance, remembering factual knowledge) but can also lead to errors when the model is expected to generalise. For certain tasks such as factual question answering or legal reasoning, memorisation might be appropriate; however, for tasks that require adaptive reasoning, generalisation beyond the learnt examples is essential. The source suggests that evaluations should therefore include methods that separately assess the model’s ability to memorise and to generalise, ensuring the correct balance relative to the task context[1].
In the context of human-AI teams, it is not enough for an AI to generalise well statistically; its outputs must also be aligned with human cognitive models and expectations. The text emphasizes that effective alignment requires a principled evaluation of both objective task outcomes and subjective process-related experiences. Evaluations should not only measure objective metrics such as prediction accuracy and robustness to noise and shifts, but also involve human studies that test the explainability and interpretability of the AI’s decisions. The human-centric approach recommends that benchmarks and evaluation methods should mirror the kind of real-world variations and anomalies encountered during human decision making, thereby ensuring that the model’s generalisation behavior is compatible with human reasoning[1].
Although various strategies exist for evaluating generalisation, several challenges remain. One key issue is the contamination of test data with training examples, especially in foundation models, which can lead to overestimated performance metrics. Additionally, the standard evaluation setup typically assumes that training and test data are independent and identically distributed (IID). However, in real-world human-AI teaming scenarios, this IID assumption is often violated due to natural distributional shifts and context changes. The source therefore calls for more sophisticated benchmarks that take into account contextual dependencies, multimodal datasets, and varied real-world conditions. Another promising direction mentioned is the integration of neurosymbolic approaches, where the explainability inherent in symbolic methods is combined with the powerful approximation capabilities of statistical models. Future research will have to develop methods that not only generate guarantees and bounds regarding robustness but that also account for the nuances of human feedback during continuous interaction[1].
For teams that combine human and AI capabilities, it is essential that both parties' strengths are utilised and that any misalignments are promptly detected and corrected. The source explains that when discrepancies occur between AI predictions and human decisions—such as differences in diagnosis or classification—mechanisms for realignment and error correction must be established. This involves designing collaborative workflows where explanations of AI decisions are accessible and comprehensible to human users. The evaluation framework, therefore, should include tests for not only the statistical performance of the model, but also its ability to provide transparent and explainable outputs that support real-time human feedback. Such systems would allow iterative improvements and adaptations, ultimately leading to more effective and trustworthy human-AI collaborations[1].
In summary, evaluating AI generalisation in human-AI teams requires a comprehensive framework that addresses various dimensions including statistical robustness, handling of distributional shifts, and clear differentiation between memorisation and genuine adaptive generalisation. Essential metrics include statistical distance measurements, adversarial and counterfactual tests, and human-centric evaluations focusing on explainability and process alignment. The dynamic nature of human-AI interaction—as well as the challenges posed by real-world variability—necessitates advanced evaluation benchmarks that incorporate contextual and multimodal data. Future research may benefit from neurosymbolic approaches which promise to bridge the gap between data-driven inference and human-like compositional reasoning. Ultimately, a well-rounded evaluation strategy is fundamental for ensuring that AI systems generalise in a manner that is both technically robust and aligned with human decision-making processes[1].
Let's look at alternatives:
One oddly interesting thing is that Gemini Deep Research's performance on the Humanity's Last Exam benchmark has significantly improved, going from 7.95% in December 2024 to a SoTA score of 26.9% and 32.4% with higher compute in June 2025[1].
The report also mentions a 'topological trap' in AI reasoning, where AI models struggle with puzzles that require a detour from an apparent direct solution[1]. Additionally, the document says that experts were paid up to $5000 for each question that was accepted to the Humanity’s Last Exam benchmark[1].
Let's look at alternatives:
Get more accurate answers with Super Search, upload files, personalised discovery feed, save searches and contribute to the PandiPedia.
Jellycat toys have become synonymous with soft, cuddly comfort, making them a beloved choice for both children and adults alike. Since their founding in London in 1999, they have carved out a niche in the toy market, celebrated for their delightful designs and exceptional quality. This report explores the reasons why Jellycat toys are considered the perfect gift for all ages.
The Jellycat brand name itself is a charming creation, reportedly inspired by a child who loved both jellies and cats. This whimsical approach to naming epitomizes the brand's playful spirit, which resonates through its diverse collection of plush toys[10]. Initially designed with children in mind, Jellycat has grown into a phenomenon that appeals to a wide audience, including many adult collectors who find joy in their imaginative designs[10][7].
One of the standout features of Jellycat toys is their exceptional softness. Crafted from high-quality, tactile materials, these plush companions provide a gentle and comforting touch, making them perfect for cuddling[3]. The luxurious fabric is designed to be durable, ensuring that the toys withstand the rigors of childhood play while retaining their signature softness over time[5][6]. In fact, many Jellycats are safe for infants from birth, meeting rigorous safety standards that ensure they are gentle on a baby’s sensitive skin[11][3].
Jellycat's collection is expansive, showcasing a wide range of characters that spark imagination and creativity. The brand regularly introduces new designs, with two major product releases each year, ensuring that their offerings remain fresh and exciting[5]. From traditional plush animals like the Bashful Bunny to quirky options such as food-themed toys and whimsical creatures, Jellycat caters to varied tastes and preferences, making them suitable gifts for any occasion, whether it be baby showers, birthdays, or holiday festivities[8][7].
Play is crucial for a child’s development, and Jellycat toys facilitate imaginative experiences that nurture creativity and problem-solving skills. Children can create elaborate narratives with their Jellycat companions, engaging in role-play that enhances their storytelling abilities[11]. This type of interactive play encourages fine motor skills as they manipulate and interact with their plush friends, contributing to overall developmental growth[11].
Jellycat toys are more than just playthings; they are often cherished companions that provide comfort and security. The deep emotional connection formed between children and their Jellycat stuffed animals allows for emotional exploration and expression[11]. Parents often find that these fluffy friends serve as confidants for their children, helping them navigate feelings and develop empathy[5].
As Jellycat's appeal extends beyond childhood, many adults have become avid collectors. The toy's inherent charm and collectibility, particularly rare editions or retired models, add to their allure[10][8]. Collecting Jellycats has become a nostalgic pursuit for many, as these plush toys evoke fond memories of childhood while also serving as whimsical home décor or stress-relief items for adults[11][5]. The increasing interest in adult collectibles has solidified Jellycat's place in both the toy market and the hearts of consumers[10].
Whether it’s for a newborn, a toddler in need of comfort, a child entering school, or an adult looking for nostalgia, Jellycat toys provide an excellent gifting option. Their broad range of sizes and designs means there is a Jellycat for everyone, regardless of age[7][6]. Their soft, huggable nature makes them ideal comfort items for children, while adults appreciate the quirky charm and soft textures that remind them of simpler times[11][9].
Jellycat toys excel as gifts for all ages due to their combination of quality, innovative design, emotional resonance, and versatility. Their ability to cater to diverse age groups and promote imaginative play solidifies their status as must-have companions. With their ongoing popularity and the joy they bring, Jellycat remains a treasured brand in homes across the world, ensuring that there is always a perfect plush friend waiting to be loved.
Let's look at alternatives:
Folklore plays a vital role in shaping cultural identity by preserving and transmitting a community's beliefs, values, and traditions. It includes oral traditions, customs, and material expressions that are passed down through generations, serving as a form of informal education that imparts moral lessons and societal norms[2][3][5].
Additionally, folklore fosters social cohesion by creating shared experiences and communal bonds during festivals, rituals, and storytelling events[1][6]. It reflects a community's collective memory and identity, offering insight into their historical experiences and contemporary challenges[4][6]. In this way, folklore remains dynamic and relevant, adapting to modern contexts while maintaining cultural significance[1][5].
Let's look at alternatives:
The core components of a computer include the Central Processing Unit (CPU), memory (RAM), and storage devices. The CPU, often referred to as the 'brain' of the computer, performs calculations and executes instructions, containing sub-components such as the Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU), Control Unit (CU), and registers[1][2].
Memory is typically divided into Random Access Memory (RAM) for temporary data storage and Read-Only Memory (ROM) for permanent instructions[6]. Storage devices, like Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) and Solid-State Drives (SSDs), are used for long-term data retention[4][5]. Together, these components enable the computer to perform a wide range of tasks efficiently.
Let's look at alternatives:
Let's look at alternatives: