Pandipedia is the world's first encyclopaedia of machine generated content approved by humans. You can contribute by simply searching and clicking/tapping on "Add To Pandipedia" in the answer you like. Learn More
Expand the world's knowledge as you search and help others. Go you!
Cold weather can increase the urge to pee due to two main physiological responses. First, in winter, people typically sweat less, leading to more fluid being excreted as urine since the body loses less through perspiration. This results in increased urine output as the body maintains hydration levels indoors where water sources are readily available[1][3].
Additionally, cold weather triggers 'cold-induced diuresis,' where blood flow is directed away from the skin to conserve heat, increasing blood flow to the kidneys. This heightens urine production as more blood is filtered[2][3]. Furthermore, cold can cause pelvic floor muscle tension, leading to more bladder spasms, intensifying the need to urinate[2].
Let's look at alternatives:
LRMs face a complete accuracy collapse beyond certain complexities.
Parshin Shojaee[1]
Their reasoning effort increases with problem complexity up to a point, then declines.
Parshin Shojaee[1]
The fundamental capabilities, scaling properties, and limitations remain insufficiently understood.
Parshin Shojaee[1]
Models demonstrate nuanced relationships between compositional depth and performance.
Parshin Shojaee[1]
Current approaches may be encountering fundamental barriers to generalizable reasoning.
Parshin Shojaee[1]
Let's look at alternatives:
Get more accurate answers with Super Search, upload files, personalised discovery feed, save searches and contribute to the PandiPedia.
Mixed media art refers to artwork in which more than one medium or material has been employed. Common examples of mixed media include assemblages, collages, and sculptures. The materials used can encompass paint, cloth, paper, wood, and found objects among others[1].
Mixed media art differs from multimedia art, which combines visual elements with non-visual components such as sound and interactivity[1]. The genre gained popularity in the 20th century with modern artworks like Pablo Picasso's 1912 collage 'Still Life with Chair Caning' being notable examples[1]. Different forms within mixed media art include collage, assemblage, found object art, altered books, and the use of wet and dry media[1].
Let's look at alternatives:
According to LinkedIn's 2023 Future of Work Report, the conversation around AI's impact on the job market has surged significantly, with 47% of professionals believing that leveraging AI will advance their careers. However, AI poses risks for job displacement, particularly among Gen Z, who might be more susceptible as many of their tasks could be automated. Overall, AI is expected to impact or augment around 55% of jobs by 2030.
Let's look at alternatives:
Bing[1]'s Deep Search[1] is an enhanced feature that aims to provide more relevant and comprehensive answers to[1] complex search queries[1]. It incorporates GPT-4[1], a state-of-the-art generative AI LLM[1] (Large Language Model[1]), to expand search queries into more detailed descriptions of the ideal set of search results. Deep Search utilizes GPT-4 to understand the user's intent and generate a comprehensive description that captures their expectations accurately.
This expanded description helps Bing[1] understand the type of information the user is seeking, allowing for a deeper exploration of the web. Deep Search[1] goes beyond the regular search results[1] by searching for pages that match the comprehensive description[1], even if they don't explicitly contain the original keywords. It considers a variety of signals, such as relevance, level of detail, credibility of the source, freshness, and popularity, to rank the results and present a curated list of[1] answers that are more likely to satisfy the user's query.
It's important to note that Deep Search[1] is an optional feature and not meant for every query or[1] user. Bing[1] will always return regular search results[1] in less than a second. Deep Search[1] is currently being tested and improved, and it is available to randomly selected small groups of users[1] worldwide. Feedback and suggestions on how to enhance Deep Search are welcomed.
Thus, Bing[1]'s Deep Search[1] is a feature that uses GPT-4[1] to provide more comprehensive and specific answers to complex search queries[1], offering a deeper exploration of the web.
Let's look at alternatives:
2023 marked the first major price increase by global streaming platforms.
Expected future progress includes a second round of price increases.
Artist-centric payment models are being adopted by more streaming platforms.
The traditional 'pro rata' payout model is being modernized.
Deezer's Artist-Centric Model was launched with UMG in September 2023.
Let's look at alternatives:
Get more accurate answers with Super Search, upload files, personalised discovery feed, save searches and contribute to the PandiPedia.
Let's look at alternatives:
Jokes about stereotypes can serve as both humorous and harmful social tools. They can be viewed as relatable exaggerations, acting as comedic shorthand or cultural icebreakers that facilitate conversations. However, they can also reinforce negative stereotypes and create discomfort among marginalized groups[2][5]. Disparagement humor, which often targets specific social groups, can lead to the normalization of prejudice and discrimination, particularly when the joke is perceived as a reflection of hostility rather than humor[1][3].
The effectiveness and reception of these jokes often depend on who delivers them. Jokes told by individuals belonging to the targeted group can be seen as less offensive and more humorous than those told by outsiders, as the audience may interpret the intention behind the joke differently[4][5].
Let's look at alternatives:
Google's monopoly power is primarily driven by its advertising revenue, which is crucial for maintaining its market position. David Dahlquist, representing the United States, stated that without this revenue, Google's operational feedback loop would cease to function effectively, linking its monopoly power directly to its advertising strategies[1].
Additionally, Google's ability to optimize its auction processes and adjust ad pricing contributes to its market dominance[2]. The presence of access points like GSA and Chrome on Samsung devices also plays a significant role in its revenue generation, further solidifying its position in the market through network effects that attract both users and developers[3].
Let's look at alternatives:
TTD-DR introduces a novel framework that models the generation of research reports as an iterative diffusion process. Unlike traditional research agents that follow a linear or parallel planning process, TTD-DR is designed to mimic the human writing process. It begins with a preliminary draft—a 'noisy' initial output—which is then refined in successive steps. This draft-centric approach helps the agent maintain a global context throughout the report-generation process, reducing information loss and improving the overall coherence of the final document[1].
One of the core innovations of TTD-DR is its denoising mechanism that is dynamically augmented by external information retrieval. Instead of simply refining the output repetitively, the system uses each revised report as a guide to generate targeted search queries. After the retrieval process, the new information is integrated to eliminate errors and gaps in the draft. This continuous feedback loop between refining the draft and retrieving additional data enables the report to become more detailed and accurate with each iteration. As a result, TTD-DR can incorporate up to 51.2% of the final report’s information in early revision steps, thereby ensuring that critical data is captured sooner and more effectively compared to traditional models[1].
TTD-DR further distinguishes itself through a self-evolutionary algorithm applied at each component of its workflow. Instead of treating the plan generation, search question generation, answer synthesis, and final report assembly as isolated tasks, TTD-DR continuously optimizes each module. The self-evolution process produces multiple variants for components like search queries and answers. It then evaluates these variants using an LLM-based judge that provides fitness scores and textual feedback. The system iteratively revises its outputs based on this feedback, merging the highest-quality variants into a single improved version. This component-wise self-evolution significantly enhances the richness and accuracy of the context provided to the report-generation process, thereby outpacing the performance of conventional research agents that do not employ such dynamic tuning[1].
The integration of denoising with retrieval and self-evolution helps TTD-DR to explore a wider range of search queries and gather more diverse data. It has been observed that the denoising process increases query novelty by more than 12 percentage points across the search iterations. This means that the system is constantly uncovering new key points and ideas that are then assimilated into the evolving draft. Moreover, by including retrieved information in the earlier stages of the search process, TTD-DR is able to guide its subsequent queries more intelligently, leading to a more comprehensive and timely refinement of the draft. This early incorporation of new data is a distinct advantage over traditional agents that may not integrate feedback as systematically[1].
Empirical results clearly demonstrate the performance benefits of TTD-DR. When compared with established systems like OpenAI Deep Research and other recent deep research agents, TTD-DR has shown remarkable gains. For instance, in side-by-side evaluations for long-form research report tasks, TTD-DR achieved a win rate of 69.1% over its competitors. It also outperformed other systems across a variety of benchmarks, including those requiring multi-hop reasoning and complex reasoning to generate short-form answers. These improvements are a direct consequence of the integrated iterative refinement and the continuous feedback provided by both the denoising and self-evolution processes. The robust performance across diverse evaluation metrics underscores the strength of the TTD-DR framework in addressing the limitations faced by traditional research agents[1].
An important aspect of TTD-DR’s design is its efficiency in test-time compute scaling. By integrating both denoising with retrieval and self-evolution, the system achieves significant performance gains without incurring excessively high latency. The iterative nature of the process means that even with additional computation steps—up to a fixed number of revision cycles—the performance improvement per unit increase in latency is substantial. This efficiency, showcased by its steep performance improvement curve in Pareto frontier analyses, means that TTD-DR not only delivers high-quality research outputs but does so in a time-efficient manner compared to traditional methods that may require more extensive processing without equivalent gains[1].
TTD-DR outperforms traditional research agents by fundamentally rethinking the way research reports are generated. Emulating human cognitive patterns, the system starts with a draft that is iteratively refined through denoising with retrieval, ensuring that global context is maintained and enhanced with each revision. Its component-wise self-evolution further boosts the quality of each step in the research workflow by exploring diverse alternatives and integrating the best outcomes. Coupled with early incorporation of new information and efficient test-time scaling, TTD-DR consistently delivers better performance as measured by higher win rates and improved accuracy on comprehensive benchmarks. This innovative approach not only advances the state-of-the-art in deep research agent design but also paves the way for more adaptable and effective automated research solutions[1].
Let's look at alternatives: