What NIST said was ready now, and what still needs foundational work
Ready-now areas include terminology and taxonomy, TEVV methods and metrics, provenance and content-origin transparency, risk-based management, security, privacy, transparency about system and data characteristics, training data practices, and incident response.[3]
NIST says the NIST AI RMF, plus ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and ISO/IEC 42001, give governance teams an important basis for risk-based AI management. That is a usable foundation, not proof that every related standard area is fully settled.[4]
NIST also flags areas that are not yet ready for standardization: AI model resource-consumption measurement, conformity assessment, testing and evaluation datasets, interpretability, explainability, and human-AI configuration.[5]
Create your account to keep this answer and continue from it later.
Let's look at alternatives:
- Modify the query.
- Start a new thread.
- Remove sources (if manually added).


