92
AI governance is becoming a procurement issue because the Pentagon is increasingly relying on bilateral agreements rather than statutes to set rules for military AI use[1]. This framework, often called regulation by contract, shifts interpretive authority to the government, leaving enforcement dependent on negotiated terms that may lack democratic accountability or institutional durability[1].
Conflicts arise when vendors attempt to impose safety guardrails that limit military applications, leading the Pentagon to designate non-compliant companies as supply chain risks[1][4].
Sign Up To Try Advanced Features
Get more accurate answers with Super Pandi, upload files, personalized discovery feed, save searches and contribute to the PandiPedia.
Sorry, Pandi could not find an answer.
Let's look at alternatives:
- Modify the query.
- Start a new thread.
- Remove sources (if manually added).
Related Content From The Pandipedia
How is cybersecurity becoming a national security issue?AI Model Marketplaces: Benefits, Risks, and GovernanceGovernment Strategies to Address Housing ShortagesQuotes on the nature of love and sacrifice in the face of perilEthical Concerns in AI DevelopmentGlobal Responses to Cybersecurity AttacksWhat are the future trends in AI-driven procurement?Current Challenges in CybersecurityCinematic Drone Glide Over Futuristic Floating City at DuskImplications of AI Advancements in HealthcareWhat role do drones play in modern logistics?What are the national security considerations of widespread AI deployment?Trends in Cybersecurity Threats for 2024Who benefits from chauffeur-driven services?Advancements in Transparency through Explainable AI