Vitamin D: mixed and inconsistent guideline recommendations, with several guidelines making no suggestion; this reflects uncertainty, not proven ineffectiveness.
Falls education: recommendations were also inconsistent, showing variable guideline endorsement rather than a settled consensus.
Hip protectors: often missing from guidelines, and about half made no recommendation; this is an under-addressed guidance gap, not evidence of ineffectiveness.
Digital technologies or wearables: frequently absent from guidelines, with about half making no recommendation, signaling limited and emerging guidance.
Cognitive factors and patient or caregiver involvement: cognitive evaluation was usually mentioned, but specific cognitive-domain guidance was lacking and no guideline panel included patients or caregivers; this shows incomplete consensus, not ineffectiveness.
Create your account to keep this answer and continue from it later.
Let's look at alternatives: