Pandipedia entry
FY 2023 climate disclosure: uptake rose, completeness lagged
82% of 3,814 companies disclosed at least one TCFD item, but only about 2% to 3% disclosed all 11.
44% of companies disclosed at least five of the 11 TCFD recommendations.
Only 11% disclosed how their strategy would hold up under different climate scenarios.
Just 18% explained how climate risk processes are integrated into overall risk management.
Climate reporting was stronger on simpler items, with GHG emissions at 63% and climate metrics and targets above 50%.
1/5
Sorry, Pandi could not find an answer.
Let's look at alternatives:
- Modify the query.
- Start a new thread.
- Remove sources (if manually added).
Continue exploring
Explore related topics
TCFD in 2024: broad adoption, thin depthComparing GRI, IFRS S1 and S2, and ESRS for reporting teams. Build a multi-section comparison across GRI impact reporting, ISSB investor-focused financial disclosures, and ESRS double materiality requirements. Include a table covering audience, core disclosure areas, effective timing, materiality approach, metrics, assurance or trust signals, and practical implications for avoiding duplicated reporting.One Climate Process, Two Reporting RegimesFive Reality Checks on Wearables in Emerging MarketsFive climate-fintech numbers: money, impact, and what the sources do not yetAssurance-Ready Sustainability Disclosures: Practical Readiness QuizWhich UK procurement signals point to better competition?. Build a structured briefing for capture teams and analysts on what the first year of UK Procurement Act data says about open methods, direct awards, single-bid lots, pre-market engagement, SME participation, and remaining data gaps. Include practical watchpoints for opportunity qualification, incumbent analysis, and buyer monitoring.What alignment really means across ESRS, ISSB, GRI, and CDP