Entrée Pandipedia
The role of nature and mass in marine engineering

In preferring weight to strength we more closely follow the course pointed out by the analogy of nature [1].Alan Stevenson[1]

The more close the analogy between nature and our works, the less difficulty we shall experience in passing from nature to art [1].Alan Stevenson[1]

Mass, therefore, seems to be a source of stability, the effect of which is at once apprehended by the mind, as more in harmony with the conservative principles of nature [1].Alan Stevenson[1]

It will readily be perceived that we are in a very different and less advantageous position when we attempt, from such observations of natural phenomena in which weight is solely concerned, to deduce the strength of an artificial fabric capable of resisting the same forces [1].Alan Stevenson[1]

When we have to do with, and to endeavour to control, those powers of nature that are subject to no calculation, I trust it will be deemed prudent not to omit, in such a case, anything that can without difficulty be applied, and that would be likely to add to the security [1].Smeaton[1]
1/5
Enregistrez cette réponse
Créez votre compte pour conserver cette réponse et la reprendre plus tard.
Désolé, Pandi n'a pas trouvé de réponse.
Examinons les alternatives :
- Modifier la requête.
- Démarrer une nouvelle conversation.
- Supprimer des sources (si elles ont été ajoutées manuellement).
Continuer l’exploration
Explorer des sujets liés
Quotes on the genius of Fresnel and lighthouse scienceFrom Punch Cards to Cobots: Five Milestones, Dates Still to VerifyMeasurement of Wave Force on Lighthouse StructuresHow nature immersion programs improve executive function. Review academic studies on attention restoration theory and real world immersion camps. Suggest program design elements for organizations.Engineering Challenges Overcome in the Construction of the Skerryvore LighthouseDesign and Construction of the Skerryvore LighthouseWrite a Twitter thread (X thread) about the very latest AI news, formatted as follows:
1. **First tweet (hook):**
* Spark curiosity with a provocative question or surprising statement about AI today.
* Tease that you'll share several must-know developments in the thread.
* Keep it ≤280 characters and avoid hashtags.
2. **Subsequent tweets (one per news item):** For each:
* **Headline/Context (concise):** A short phrase identifying the development (e.g., “Major breakthrough in multimodal models”).
* **Key insight:** State the single most important takeaway or implication (“It can now generate lifelike videos from text prompts, potentially transforming content creation.”).
* **Why it matters / curiosity angle:** A brief note on impact or a rhetorical question that encourages engagement (“Could this replace human editors?”).
* **Brevity:** Stay within 280 characters total.
* **Tone:** Informational yet conversational and shareable—use an emoji or casual phrasing if it fits, but avoid hashtags.
* **Optional source reference:** If possible, mention “According to \[source]” or “As reported by \[outlet] on \[date]” in as few words as feasible.
3. **Final tweet (call-to-action):**
* Invite replies or retweets (e.g., “Which of these AI advances surprises you most? Reply below!”).
* Keep it concise and avoid hashtags.
Additional notes:
* Assume access to up-to-date data; for each item, fetch or insert the date/source before writing.
* Ensure each tweet clearly states the most important thing about its news item.
* Avoid hashtags altogether.Historical quotes on lighthouse innovation and engineering