Rwanda FinScope Survey 2024
63
Satisfaction
Most customers report high levels of satisfaction with the services they receive and can count
on bank staff for financial advice. The least performing indicator is the measure of “reasonable
cost”. Compared to bank users, mobile money users feel that charges or fees are not afford-
able. The perceived high service cost is a key concern that affects the frequency of service
usage observed while assessing the frequency of service use.
Figure 64: Statements around banking products and service
89 87 78 76 66 62 51
9 12 18 22 32 34 46
2 4 2 1 2 4 3
Can count on your
bank staff for
financial advice
Satisfied with your
bank's customer
support
Fees and charges
are transparent or
easy to understand
You would choose
the same account
Too much
downtime on the
bank platform
Bank fees or
charges are
affordable
Mobile money fees
or charges are
affordable
TRUE FALSE Do not know
Rwanda FinScope Survey 2024
64
5
IMPACT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
Rwanda FinScope Survey 2024
65
The impact of financial services is far reaching influencing various aspects of our lives from
personal finance to economic growth and social progress. Measuring the impact of financial
services and products involves assessing effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes, such
as improved livehoods.
5.1 Financial Needs
The ‘needs’-based framework looks at how or why people are using financial services and
where the formal sector might be falling short. These ‘needs’ are based on an understanding
that people use financial services to meet a specific need. The reasons for which people use
financial services can be categorized into one of four universal financial needs:
1.
Transfer of value – to make payment or transfer.
2.
Liquidity – to meet expenses within an income cycle.
3.
Resilience – to meet large expenses that have resulted from a financial shock.
4.
Meeting goals – to achieve events/life objectives that require financing.
Is the financial sector meeting the needs of Rwandans? How do individuals meet their finan-
cial needs?
Transfer of value – Almost all adults have a need to make payments or transfer value
from one person to another. 94% (7.7million) of adults have either bought airtime, paid
bills, sent money etc. in the past 12 months. A higher proportion of adults are meeting
this need both via digital channels as well as cash. Digital channels are driven largely
by use of mobile money. This shows that the financial sector is meeting the transfer of
value needs of individuals as they have the financial products they can use to transact.
Liquidity – the indicator looks at the ability to meet expenses within an income
cycle. 88% (7.1 million) reported having ran out of money for food or important things
in the past 12 months (50% experienced challenges with liquidity more often). Only
a few individuals managed to get financial help from financial institutions when they
had liquidity issues. Financial institutions tend to prioritise funding productive needs
hence the reliance on informal credit is high.
Resilience – Almost three quarters (72%/5.8million) of the adults experienced a risky
event that had a financial impact. This indicator looks at the ability to deal with shocks.
Few Rwandan adults who experienced risky events used financial mechanisms or prod-
ucts such as insurance, formal savings or balance in account to cope with risk. Majority
of them resorted to non-financial coping means such doing nothing or cutting down
expenses or receiving assistance from family or friends. This may indicate that the role
of the financial sector on risk transfer is limited. Main hindrance to uptake of insurance
products remains affordability/product suitability and lack of awareness.
Meeting goal – About 81% (6.6million) of Rwandan adults reported that they have
some life objectives or goals that they are trying to meet. These include mainly devel-
opmental goals such as investing in their business, buying/building a house, buying a
land, education among others. More than 3.7 million adults or 46% would like to invest
or start their businesses (this includes the 19% who would like to buy agriculture and
business inputs and assets). Around 39% (3.2million) have housing or land financing
need. Above a third of adults who have a financial goal are not meeting this need and
are doing nothing about it. Another 29% used financial products (but only 7% used for-
mal credit). Importantly, the financial sector has the opportunity to grow its relevance
on meeting people’s needs, especially through credit. (e.g., mortgage finance, educa-
tion finance, MSME in productive sectors financing, etc.).
Rwanda FinScope Survey 2024 66 Table 8: Universal Financial Needs TRANSFER OF VALUE 94% LIQUIDITY 89% How they met the transfer of value need (device used) How they managed liquidity need (device used) Cash 92% Formal savings 3% Digital – Bank 13% Informal savings 3% Digital – MM 70% Formal credit 1% Informal credit/got goods on credit 27% Family/friends credit 7% Sold assets/livestock 4% Did nothing/cut down expenses 44% Other 11% RESILIENCE TO FINANCIAL SHOCK 72% MEETING GOAL 81% Main Risk experienced: Main goals: Serious illness 33% Start/expand business 27% Price increase 26% Buy/build house 22% Theft 12% Buy inputs/assets/agriculture activities 19% Death 8% Buy land 18% Household member lost 6% Education 8% income/job 2% Other 6% How they coped with risk (device used) How they met their goal (device used) Savings 8% Formal savings 2% Insurance 1% Informal savings 9% Formal credit 1% Formal credit 7% Informal credit/got goods on credit 19% Informal credit/got goods on credit 11% Family/friends credit 7% Family/friends credit 1% Sold assets/livestock 12% Sold assets/livestock 6% Did nothing/cut down expenses 41% Worked more/got additional jobs 26% Did nothing/cut down expenses 35% 5.2 Financial health The advocacy for increased financial inclusion assumes that access to financial products and services has a positive impact on individuals’ financial well-being. However, policy efforts have primarily focused on expanding financial inclusion without fully considering its effect on consumers’ financial health. FinScope Rwanda 2020 introduced the concept of financial health to highlight how financial services can contribute to individuals’ and societies’ well-be- ing. By using a financial health indicator, policymakers can design financial policies that priori- tize consumers’ financial health, as well as inform social protection and employment policies. Additionally, this indicator can serve as a tool to evaluate progress in these areas.
Rwanda FinScope Survey 2024 67 5.2.1 Defining financial health index The financial health index provides valuable insights into individuals’ financial conditions. However, to analyze specific segments of the population, such as gender, income groups, and location, a ranking system is necessary. To achieve this, the indices have been grouped into four quartiles. The healthiest individuals, classified as financially healthy, have index val- ues ranging from 75 to 100. Those with index values between 50 and 74 are considered finan- cially coping, while those with values between 25 and 49 are classified as financially vulnera- ble. Individuals with index values less than 25 are considered extremely financially vulnerable. The financial health of consumers is defined as the ability to manage current financial obli- gations smoothly and have confidence in their financial future. This is measured using four key parameters: the ability to manage day-to-day financial transactions, taking advantage of opportunities, resilience against shocks, and having control over one’s financial decisions. By assessing these parameters, the financial health index provides a comprehensive understand- ing of individuals’ financial well-being. 5.2.2 Managing day-to-day finances The “Day-to-Day” dimension measures the ability to manage short-term financial resources effectively, ensuring that income covers expenses and consumption needs. The results show an improvement in day-to-day financial management between 2020 and 2024, with a 0.6 increase in the overall mean (average) score. The Day-to-Day sub-scores reveal: • “Control spend” increased from 1.9 to 2.5, indicating better expense management. • “Means to close liquidity gap” decreased from 3.9 to 3.2, suggesting a slight decline in the ability to bridge financial gaps. Overall, the results suggest progress in managing daily finances, with some areas for im- provement. Table 9: Managing day to day index scores and sub-mean score Dimension 2020 2024 Day-to-day (overall) 5.9 6.5 Control spend 1.9 2.5 Means to close liquidity gap 3.9 3.2 Income cycle
3 5.2.3 Taking advantage of opportunities The “Opportunities” dimension assesses consumers’ ability to take advantage of economic growth opportunities, including saving and investing, setting goals, and achieving financial objectives. The results show a decline in the overall opportunity score, from 6.5 in 2020 to 5.5 in 2024 (Table 10). The opportunities sub-scores reveal: • “Save and investment” remained relatively stable, increasing slightly from 2.1 to 2.2. • “Achieving goals” decreased significantly from 2.3 to 1.2, indicating a decline in progress towards financial objectives. The decline in the overall opportunity score suggests that consumers are struggling to achieve their financial goals and make progress toward economic growth. It has been noted that majority of Rwandans who have life goals are not using financial products/services to meet goals.
Rwanda FinScope Survey 2024 68 Table 10: Opportunity index scores and sub-mean score Index 2020 2024 Opportunities (overall) 6.5 5.5 Saving and Investment 2.1 2.2 Achieving goals 2.3 1.2 Accomplished financial goals 3.1 5.2.4 Resilience towards shocks Financial health includes being prepared for unexpected setbacks or emergencies. The Resil- ience indicator assesses the ability to manage and recover from financial shocks. The index includes the ability to raise emergency funds, the ability to respond to shocks and the recov- ery period. The results (Table 11) show a significant increase in the overall Resilience score from 2.8 in 2020 to 6.4 in 2024. This improvement is consistent with the increase in insurance coverage among Rwandans, with around 1 million adults acquiring insurance products since 2020. The resilience sub-scores reveal: • Ability to raise emergency funds increased from 0.8 to 2.6 • Ability to respond to shocks remained stable at 2.6 This suggests that Rwandans are becoming more financially resilient, with an improved ability to manage and recover from financial emergencies. Table 11: Resilient index scores and sub-mean score Index 2020 2024 Opportunities (overall) 2.8 6.4 Ability and means of raising emergency funds 0.8 2.6 Means of responding to shocks 2.2 2.6 Recovery period
2.6 5.2.5 Control over own financial affairs (Act) The “Act” dimension assesses respondents’ ability to control their finances and make sound financial decisions. The metrics include input in household financial decisions, financial com- mitment management, and debt management. The results (Table 12) show an increase in the overall act score from 10.7 in 2020 to 13.5 in 2024, indicating that more Rwandans are taking control of their financial affairs and making sound financial decisions. The Act sub-scores reveal: • Financial decision-making increased from 3.2 to 3.6 • Financial commitment management remained stable at 3.7 • Debt management decreased slightly from 4.3 to 4.2 This suggests that Rwandans are becoming more financially empowered, with improved de- cision-making and control over their financial commitments, although debt management remains an area for improvement. Table 12: Act index mean scores and sub-means score Index 2020 2024 Act (overall) 10.7 13.5 Financial decision 3.2 3.6 Financial commitment management 3.7 3.7 Debt management 4.3 4.2
Rwanda FinScope Survey 2024
69
5.2.6 Financial health indicator
Developing the financial health indicator involves two steps wherein the score is computed
by aggregating all the scores and transforming the scores into percentages using the follow-
ing steps:
Financial Health Score = Manage day-to-day finances + Opportunities (Taking ad-
vantage of opportunities) + Resilience +ACT.
Financial Health Index = FHS x (100 x FHS)
Overall, the financial health of Rwandans is improving, 10% of adults or 1.3 million adults who
were financially vulnerable in 2020 are now financially stable (coping or financially healthy).
This means more than 2 in 3 adults are in a better situation to balance their income and
expenses, take advantage of the economic situation, be resilient and able to make sound
financial decisions and have control over their financial affairs. The Financially healthy indi-
cator showed the most significant improvement, increasing by 6 percentage points, from 4%
in 2020 to 10% in 2024. This means that more adults are now financially stable, able to save,
invest, and make informed financial decisions. Overall, these changes indicate a positive trend
towards improved financial health among Rwandans, with fewer adults struggling financially
and more achieving financial stability.
Figure 65 reveals four financial health segments, at the bottom pyramid are the extremely
206K or 3% adults and close to a third or 2.6 million adults classified as financial vulnerable.
Around 57% or 4.6 million adults are approaching financial health status as they scored some
of the 12 indicators, but there are areas of development. The last segment are the individuals
(10% or 780,000) described as financial healthy, they are likely to have scored nearly or all 12
indicators and can balance their income and expenses, taking advantage of the economic
situation, resilient and able to make sound financial decisions.
Figure 65: Financial health strand (%)
Extremely financially
vulnerable
Financially vulnerable Financially coping Financially healthy
0-24 25-49 50-74 75-100
206K 2.6M 4.6M 778k
3% 31% 57% 10%
7
3
37
31
53
57
4
10
2020
2024
Rwanda FinScope Survey 2024
70
5.3 Summary of the Financial health indicator
In summary, financial health indicator is based upon 12 behaviour indicators including con-
trol spend, means to close liquidity gap, income cycle, save and investment, achieving goals,
accomplished financial goals, ability and means of raising emergency funds, means of re-
sponding to shocks, recovery period from shock, financial decision, financial commitment
management and debt management. Figure 66 demonstrate scores allocation, defined seg-
ments, and size of the segments.
Figure 66: Summary of the Financial indicator construction and segments
2024
2020
0
10
24
0
30
40
49
50
60
74
75
80
90
100
Health scores between
0-24 represent individuals
that are extremely
vulnerable and unable to
survive and manage their
financial situations
Health scores between 25-49
represent individuals that are
financially vulnerable and
unable to survive and manage
their financial situations. These
individuals scored few of the 12
indicators
Health scores between 50-74
represent individuals that are
considered financially coping.
These individuals scored some
of the 12 indicators, but have
room for improvement
Health scores between 75-100 represent
individuals that are considered to be very
healthy to balance their income and
expenses, take advantage of the
economic situation, resilient and able to
make sound financial decisions. These
individuals scored nearly all or all of the
12 indicators
Extremely financially
vulnerable
Financially
vulnerable
Financially coping
Financially healthy
5.4 Welfare and Vulnerability indicators
Linking the aspect of financial health indicators with welfare indicators is crucial as this speaks
directly to the SDGs with a clear overlap on how financial services assist in this regard. Com-
pared to 2020, there have been notable improvements. A lower proportion of adults/house-
holds have reported having gone without cash income and making plans for daily needs,
skipping meals because of lack of money. The effects of the pandemic are also visible as
households faced more challenges in 2020 than in 2024 due to restrictions in movement and
generating income. Although 2024 has some improvements, we still have households facing
difficulties. This leaves a considerable proportion of households susceptible to poverty, and
lack of basic amenities, and education. Poverty-alleviating interventions to improve standards
of living are of paramount importance.
Figure 67: Welfare and Vulnerability indicators (%)
54
63
34
37
40
44
61
83
Gone without cash income and had
to make a plan for daily needs
Had to skip a meal because
of lack of money for food
Gone without treatment or
medicine because of lack of money
Not been able to send kids to school
because of lack of transport/ fees/uniforms
2024
2020