asdf
United Nations
Economic &
S o c i a l A f f a i r s
@ek\ieXkfeXcJkXe[Xi[@e[ljkiXc:cXjj]ZXkfef]8cc<ZfefdZ8Zkmk\j@J@: #I\m%+ @ek\ieXkfeXcJkXe[Xi[@e[ljkiXc :cXjj]ZXkfef]8cc<ZfefdZ 8Zkmk\j@J@: #I\m%+
Statistical Papers
Series M No. 4, Rev.4
Published by the United Nations
ISBN 978-92-1-161518-0
Sales No. E.08.XVII.25
07-66517—August 2008—2,330
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Statistics Division
International
Standard Industrial
Classification of All
Economic Activities
Revision 4
United Nations
New York, 2008
asdf
ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/4/Rev.4
Statistical papers
Series M No. 4/Rev.4
ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/4/Rev.4 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.08.XVII.25 ISBN: 978-92-1-161518-0 Copyright United Nations, 2008 All rights reserved Printed in United Nations, New York Department of Economic and Social Affairs The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environ- mental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Note The designations used and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The term “country” as used in this publication also refers, as appropriate, to ter- ritories or areas. The designations “developed regions” and “developing regions” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations docu- ment.
iii Preface The International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) is the international reference classification of productive activities. Its main purpose is to provide a set of activity categories that can be utilized for the collection and report- ing of statistics according to such activities. Since the adoption of the original version of ISIC in 1948, the majority of coun- tries around the world have used ISIC as their national activity classification or have developed national classifications derived from ISIC. ISIC has therefore provided guidance to countries in developing national activity classifications and has become an important tool for comparing statistical data on economic activities at the interna- tional level. Wide use has been made of ISIC, both nationally and internationally, in classifying data according to kind of economic activity in the fields of economic and social statistics, such as for statistics on national accounts, demography of enterprises, employment and others. In addition, ISIC is increasingly used for non-statistical pur- poses. This fourth revision of ISIC (ISIC, Rev.4) is the outcome of a review process that spanned several years and involved contributions from many classifications experts and users around the world. This process resulted in an ISIC structure that is more detailed than the previous version, responding to the need to identify many new industries separately. This is especially applicable in the case of services. Moreover, the relevance of the Classification has been enhanced with the introduction of new high-level categories to better reflect current economic phenomena. A new section entitled “Information and communication” (see part three, sect. J) is one such innova- tion. Comparability has also been enhanced with a number of other regional activity classifications, thus making this version of ISIC a much improved tool for interna- tional data comparison. A number of alternate aggregations have been included in the present publi- cation. They provide analytical tools for areas which, for conceptual reasons, do not lend themselves to aggregation within the existing ISIC structure. Among the alternate aggregations included in this version of ISIC are aggregations for information and communications technology, the informal sector and non-profit institutions, as well as two aggregations for national accounts-type analysis, one at very aggregated and another at an intermediate level of ISIC. The structure of the fourth revision of ISIC was considered and approved by the Statistical Commission at its thirty-seventh session, in March 2006,1 as the interna- tionally accepted standard. It now replaces the third revision of the classification2 and its update, Revision 3.1,3 which have been in use since 1989 and 2002, respectively. 1 See Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 2002, Supplement No.4 (E/2006/24), chap. I, para. 3, item 37/105 (a). 2 Statistical Papers, No.4, Rev.3 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.90.XVII.11). 3 Statistical Papers, No.4, Rev.3.1 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.03.XVII.4).
v Contents Page Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii Historical background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xii Support for ISIC users . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii Acronyms and abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiv Part one Introduction Chapter Paragraphs Page I. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1–21 3 II. The underlying principles of the classification . . . . . . . . . . . . 22–54 7 A. Purpose and nature of the classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22–37 7 1. General considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22–27 7 2. Scope of the classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28–29 8 3. Differences from other types of classifications . . . . . . . 30–37 9 B. Principles used in constructing the classification . . . . . . . . 38–45 10 C. Structure and coding system of the classification . . . . . . . . 46–54 11 III. Application of the classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55–157 13 A. Principal, secondary and ancillary activities . . . . . . . . . . . 55–63 13 B. Statistical units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64–102 14 1. General remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64–75 14 (a) Legal entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71–72 15 (b) Institutional units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73–75 15 2. Statistical units in the System of National Accounts . . . . 76–83 16 (a) Enterprise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77–79 16 (b) Establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80–83 16 3. Other statistical units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84–89 17 (a) Kind-of-activity unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 17 (b) Local unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86–87 17 (c) Unit of homogeneous production . . . . . . . . . . . 88–89 17 4. Delineating statistical units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90–99 18 5. National differences in selecting statistical units . . . . . . 100–102 19 C. Classification of statistical units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103–154 20 1. General guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103–112 20 (a) Value-added substitutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107–109 20 (b) Problems with output substitutes . . . . . . . . . . . 110–111 21 (c) Problems with input substitutes . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 21
International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Revision 4
vi
2. Treatment of mixed activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113–131
22
(a) Treatment of independent multiple activities . . . . . 115–116
22
(b) Treatment of vertical integration . . . . . . . . . . . . 117–119
22
(c) Treatment of horizontal integration . . . . . . . . . . 120–122
23
(d) The “top-down” method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123–131
23
Box 1. Example: Identifying the principal activity of a
reporting unit using the top-down method . . . . . . . .
24
Box 2. Example: Identifying the principal activity of a
reporting unit using the top-down method within
wholesale and retail trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27
3. E-commerce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132–134
28
4. Repair and maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
135
29
5. Outsourcing / activities on a fee or contract basis . . . . . 136–145
29
(a) Classification of the contractor . . . . . . . . . . . . .
139
29
(b) Classification of the principal . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140–145
30
6. Government activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146–147
30
7. Classification of enterprises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148–149
31
8. Classification of households . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150–151
31
9. Changes in the classification of units . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152–154
31
D. Capturing information about the activity of units and coding
it according to ISIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155–157
32
Chapter
IV. Other topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158–198
33
A. Use of ISIC in establishing related national classifications . . . 158–169
33
1. Aggregation and disaggregation of ISIC . . . . . . . . . . . 162–167
33
2. Level of international comparability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168–169
34
B. Use of different levels of the classification for the presentation
of statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170–171
35
C. Relationship with other classifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172–192
35
1. General remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
172
35
2. Relationship with product classifications: CPC, HS
and SITC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173–175
36
3. Other derived and related activity classifications . . . . . . 176–184
36
(a) Derived classifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179–181
37
(b) Related classifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182–184
37
4. Relationship of other international classifications with
ISIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185–192
38
D. Indexes to the classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193–194
39
E. Correspondence tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195–197
40
F. Alternative aggregations for ISIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
198
40
Paragraphs Page
Contents
vii
Part two
Broad and detailed structure
Chapter
I. Broad structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
43
II. Detailed structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45
Part three
Detailed structure and explanatory notes
Section
A. Agriculture, forestry and fishing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
65
B. Mining and quarrying . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79
C. Manufacturing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
85
D. Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
E. Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities . . . 167
F.
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
G. Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles . . . . . 179
H. Transportation and storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
I.
Accommodation and food service activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
J.
Information and communication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
K. Financial and insurance activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
216
L. Real estate activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
M. Professional, scientific and technical activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
N. Administrative and support service activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
O. Public administration and defence; compulsory social security . . . . . . . . 243
P.
Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
Q. Human health and social work activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252
R. Arts, entertainment and recreation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
S.
Other service activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
T. Activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods- and
services-producing activities of households for own use . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
U. Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
Part four
Alternative aggregations
Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199–202
273
A. Two alternative aggregations for SNA data reporting . . . . . . . . . 203–216
274
1.
High-level SNA/ISIC aggregation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204–208
274
2.
Intermediate-level SNA/ISIC aggregation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209–216
275
B. Alternative aggregation for the information economy . . . . . . . . . 217–222
277
1.
ICT sector definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218–220
277
2.
Content and media sector definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221–222
279
Paragraphs Page
International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Revision 4
viii
C. Alternative aggregation for data reporting on the informal
sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223–232
279
D. Alternative aggregation for data reporting on the non-profit
institutions sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233–237
282
Part five
Changes in ISIC, Rev.4
I. Methodological changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238–243
289
II. Structural changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244–260
289
Paragraphs Page
ix Historical background The original version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Eco- nomic Activities (ISIC)4 was adopted in 1948. In that connection, the Economic and Social Council adopted resolution 149 A (VII) of 27 August 1948, which read: “The Economic and Social Council, “Taking note of the recommendation of the Statistical Commission regard- ing the need for international comparability of economic statistics, and, “Taking note of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities which the Statistical Commission has developed with the advice and assistance of Member Governments, “Recommends that all Member Governments make use of the International Standard Industrial Classification of Economic Activities either by: “(a) Adopting this system of classification as a national standard, or “(b) Rearranging their statistical data in accordance with this system for purposes of international comparability”. Wide use has been made of ISIC both nationally and internationally in classify- ing data according to kind of economic activity in the fields of economic statistics, such as for production or national income, employment, population and others. A number of countries have utilized ISIC as the basis for developing their national indus- trial classifications. Substantial comparability has been attained between the industrial classifications of many other countries and ISIC by ensuring, as far as practicable, that the categories at detailed levels of national classifications fitted into only one category of ISIC. An increasing number of countries have adapted their national activity clas- sifications or can provide statistical series according to ISIC. The United Nations, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and other international bodies use ISIC when publishing and analysing statistical data. Experience in the use of ISIC has revealed the need for periodic review of the structure and definition of its categories and underlying principles. Changes take place in the organization of economic activities and new types of economic activities become important, while new analytical requirements develop for data classified according to kind of economic activity. Over the decades, continuing experience in the use of ISIC and the corresponding national classifications reveal aspects that should be ampli- fied, clarified or improved in other ways. For these reasons, the Statistical Commission initiated reviews and revisions of ISIC in 1956, 1965, 1979 and again in 2000. While continuity, i.e., comparability between the revised and preceding versions of ISIC, has always been a major concern expressed by the Commission, the accumulating changes in the economic structure and production patterns around the world require a careful balancing of continuity with the need for relevance of ISIC and its comparability with other existing industry classifications. 4 Statistical Papers, No. 4, Lake Success, New York, 31 October 1949.