Public procurement intelligence from tender notice…
Direct-award shares can overstate or understate competition. A few high-value direct awards can distort monthly value trends. Single-bid lots can create a false read on competition. Framework values can cause double counting because contracts may report the full framework value. Missing method data ...
ViewQ1. Which statement best captures what a low bidder count can tell you from procurement award data alone? - It can suggest reduced competition, but it does not by itself prove collusion or wrongdoing. - It proves the buyer favored a single supplier. - It proves the contract was illegally awarded. - ...
ViewUK procurement dataset risk assessment Overall, the attached sources suggest that UK procurement data is often **usable but not uniformly complete enough for every analysis question**: it is sufficient when it captures the fields needed to answer the specific question, but gaps in bidders, dates, qu...
ViewSparse notice detail can be a stop sign for suppliers and analysts. If cancellation reasons are missing, the tender trail is incomplete. A very short tender window raises delivery and bid-quality risk. No subcontractor visibility means responsibility is hard to track end to end. High-risk award valu...
ViewWant a UK procurement workflow that turns notices, awards, suppliers, documents, and spend into commercial signals? Start with the procurement process anchor: `ocid`, then scope to procedures under the Procurement Act 2023 using `tender_legalBasis_scheme = UKPGA`, and use that set of `ocid` values t...
ViewUK Procurement Act: what the first year says about competition The first year of UK Procurement Act data points to **improving competition signals**, led by a clear shift away from direct procedures and toward open procedures, alongside rising pre-market engagement and stronger SME participation[[ci...
View