Public procurement intelligence from tender notice…
UK Procurement Act: what the first year says about competition The first year of UK Procurement Act data points to **improving competition signals**, led by a clear shift away from direct procedures and toward open procedures, alongside rising pre-market engagement and stronger SME participation[[ci...
ViewDirect-award shares can overstate or understate competition. A few high-value direct awards can distort monthly value trends. Single-bid lots can create a false read on competition. Framework values can cause double counting because contracts may report the full framework value. Missing method data ...
ViewWant a UK procurement workflow that turns notices, awards, suppliers, documents, and spend into commercial signals? Start with the procurement process anchor: `ocid`, then scope to procedures under the Procurement Act 2023 using `tender_legalBasis_scheme = UKPGA`, and use that set of `ocid` values t...
ViewTracking buyers, suppliers, values, deadlines, and SME status in UK procurement data The cleanest way to work with UK procurement data is to treat each procurement process as the anchor, then join buyers, suppliers, dates, and contract details back to that process. The attached guidance says the mai...
ViewSparse notice detail can be a stop sign for suppliers and analysts. If cancellation reasons are missing, the tender trail is incomplete. A very short tender window raises delivery and bid-quality risk. No subcontractor visibility means responsibility is hard to track end to end. High-risk award valu...
ViewQ1. Which statement best captures what a low bidder count can tell you from procurement award data alone? - It can suggest reduced competition, but it does not by itself prove collusion or wrongdoing. - It proves the buyer favored a single supplier. - It proves the contract was illegally awarded. - ...
View